翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Sexual medicine
・ Sexual mimicry
・ Sexual minorities in Japan
・ Sexual Minorities Uganda
・ Sexual minority
・ Sexual misconduct
・ Sexual misconduct allegations against Bill Clinton
・ Sextus Tarquinius
・ Sextus Varius Marcellus
・ Sextus Vettulenus Cerialis
・ SexTV
・ Sextín River
・ Sexual (song)
・ Sexual abstinence
・ Sexual abuse
Sexual abuse and intellectual disability
・ Sexual abuse cases in Brooklyn's Haredi community
・ Sexual abuse cases in Galway, Kilmacduagh and Kilfenora diocese
・ Sexual abuse in Antigonish diocese
・ Sexual abuse in Cloyne diocese
・ Sexual abuse in Limerick diocese
・ Sexual abuse in Raphoe diocese
・ Sexual abuse in Santa Fe de la Vera Cruz archdiocese
・ Sexual abuse in St. John's archdiocese
・ Sexual Abuse Prevention Network
・ Sexual abuse scandal at Marylands School, Christchurch
・ Sexual abuse scandal in Arundel and Brighton diocese
・ Sexual abuse scandal in Bridgeport diocese
・ Sexual abuse scandal in Burlington diocese
・ Sexual abuse scandal in Canberra and Goulburn archdiocese


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Sexual abuse and intellectual disability : ウィキペディア英語版
Sexual abuse and intellectual disability

People with intellectual disabilities can be both the victims and perpetrators of sexual violence (often termed sexual abuse), including child sexual abuse. Prevalence rates of sexual violence against people with intellectual disabilities are high when compared with the experience of the general population.〔 Whilst people with intellectual disabilities experience sexual violence in many of the same ways as the general population,〔〔 they may encounter additional issues relating to their impairments and / or the social environments in which they live. These can include increased vulnerability, questions around ability to consent to sexual activities, differential treatment before the law, social attitudes about intellectual disability and sexuality, and restricted access to suitable support and recovery services.
==Prevalence and incidence==
There are large differences between the prevalence and incidence estimates from different pieces of research: results are affected by a number of factors:
* Differences in how sexual abuse is defined, and which experiences are counted as abuse for research purposes.
* Who is asked about the abuse: reported prevalence and incidence are lower if service managers, staff or case notes are consulted, and higher when people with intellectual disabilities are asked directly.
* Whether abuse rates for men and women are combined or calculated separately.
* Differences between the groups of people selected to take part in the research.〔Michelle McCarthy, Sexuality and Women with Learning Disabilities, Second Edition, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1999.〕
Morris showed, in a British study in 1999, that indicence data on sexual abuse of disabled children can be difficult to compile because:
* A common definition of impairment may not have been agreed between the parties making records.
* Information may not be recorded consistently.
* Some children with mild or moderate intellectual disabilities may not be registered with the services that usually record abuse incidents.〔Morris, J. (1999) 'Disabled children, child protection systems and the Children Act.' Child Abuse Review 8, 91-108, cited in Michelle McCarthy, Sexuality and Women with Learning Disabilities, Second Edition, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1999.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Sexual abuse and intellectual disability」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.